Últimas Notícias 24 Horas: Fique por Dentro dos Acontecimentos em Tempo Real

In a recent move, the U.S. Department of State has revoked visas of six foreign nationals who allegedly celebrated the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The individuals, from countries including South Africa, Argentina, Mexico, Brazil, Germany, and Paraguay, made social media posts that were deemed to glorify or trivialize Kirk's death. The U.S. government has stated that it does not welcome foreigners who wish harm upon Americans. (infobae.com)

Background on Charlie Kirk's Assassination

Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA, was assassinated on September 10, 2025, during an event at Utah Valley University. He was shot in the neck while addressing students. The suspect, Tyler Robinson, 22, was apprehended after a 33-hour manhunt. (es.euronews.com)

U.S. Government's Response

Following the assassination, the U.S. government intensified its scrutiny of foreign nationals' social media activities. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that visas would be revoked for individuals who celebrated or trivialized Kirk's death. He emphasized that the U.S. does not welcome foreigners who wish harm upon Americans. (es.euronews.com)

Implications for Visa Policies

This action reflects a broader trend of the U.S. government tightening visa policies for foreign nationals whose actions are deemed to pose a threat to national security or public safety. The revocation of visas serves as a warning to others who might consider similar actions.

International Reactions

The decision has sparked discussions internationally about freedom of speech and the extent to which governments can regulate the actions of foreign nationals. While some support the U.S. government's stance, others view it as a potential overreach.

Conclusion

The U.S. Department of State's decision to revoke visas of foreign nationals celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination underscores the government's commitment to protecting its citizens and maintaining national security. It also highlights the complexities involved in balancing freedom of expression with national interests.